Debate : 21583


Off-Topic / Debate / 21583	21582 \| 21584

Subject:	Let's beat him with 700 clubs
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date:	Tue, 15 Jul 2003 13:43:18 GMT
Viewed:	98 times

http://www.cnn.com/2003/LAW/07/15/robertson.ap/index.html I think the operative phrase in the piece is "prayer offensive." It certainly is in this case. As an interesting sidebar, and as a demonstration of his moral righteousness, Robertson is apparently a Charles Taylor All-Star: http://www.theperspective.org/patrobertson_taylor.html http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2003/127/48.0.html http://www.rense.com/general38/pat.htm http://www.secularhumanism.org/library/aah/vaneck_10_4.htm http://forums.aclu.org/messageview.cfm?catid=62&threadid=5333 From this we gather that it's an abomination to allow two men to have sex in the privacy of their home, but it's fine for a dictator to slaughter countless innocents to maintain his stranglehold, as long as there are mining contracts to be had. Even if they're linked to Al-qaeda? http://www.atheists.org/flash.line/faith49.htm Dave!

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: Let's beat him with 700 clubs
Well, at least he's not actually in a position of any real power. You can't prevent people from choosing what they want to listen to or regard as a valuable resource. I know Pat Robertson is painfully offensive for many of us, but you will find a (...) (21 years ago, 15-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

3 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search