 | | Re: How many things need to stack up before we throw this jerk out? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | Snipped a lot of stuff to focus on a couple of bits... (...) I think that may be going a bit far. The government did a poor job of acting on evidence it had before it, but that's a lot different than actually "letting" the attacks succeed. There's (...) (21 years ago, 13-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: How many things need to stack up before we throw this jerk out? —Mike Petrucelli
|
| | | | (...) Well consider what has transpired. The Governement has "accomplished" much that public opinion never would have allowed prior to 9/11. What have the perpetrators' supporters gained? Why has there not been another attack despite the fact that (...) (21 years ago, 14-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: How many things need to stack up before we throw this jerk out? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Some are and some aren't. A policy that said we would consistently attack (with nuclear weapons) any country that had a leader that said "Bush is a weenie" would be indeed consistent, but worse than what we have now. (...) Because they're a (...) (21 years ago, 14-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: How many things need to stack up before we throw this jerk out? —Mike Petrucelli
|
| | | | (...) Well at least that would be consistent. :-D Seriously though I see what your getting at. (...) I was simply wondering why we are calling them that when prior to the war Bush & company stated we were not going to occupy the country for the sake (...) (21 years ago, 14-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
