Debate : 2155


Off-Topic / Debate / 2155	2154 \| 2156

Subject:	Killing (was: Re: Voluntary, private discrimination (Was: Disparicies in Sentencing))
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date:	Sat, 11 Sep 1999 12:43:05 GMT
Viewed:	1872 times

<37D91372.E6E0B943@aeieng.com> <FHvtH0.G4z@lugnet.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit "Moz (Chris Moseley)" wrote: > > > Where did this come from? Killing anyone is wrong, both in God's word and > > against the law, whether you are a abortion doctor or a conservative. > > Killing animals is ethically hard to defend in most cases, but I think there are > gradations of naughtyness involved. I don't think it's enough to say "you killed, > you must die", and ignore everything else involved. > > Moz I would like to hear why killing animals is hard to defend. Given what premises? --Chris

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: Killing (was: Re: Voluntary, private discrimination (Was: Disparicies in Sentencing))
(...) Wondering if he means for food (which I'm willing to accept - it IS hard to defend in a lot of cases, although I love a good steak as much as the next guy) or for sport, as in the case of trophy hunters, which is impossible to defend, imo, or (...) (25 years ago, 12-Sep-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Misperceptions of America (Was: Conversation w/ a LEGO Rep)
Please, people, maybe I don't catch this stuff, but paraphrasing and hinting on a subject where some people have no clue, I think you better state, clearly, what you are talking about. Man, it is like trying to dissect what Bill Clinton is lying (...) (25 years ago, 7-Sep-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

276 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search