 | | Re: Possession
|
| (...) Yeah, elsewhere in this thread I mentioned the same thing. If one considers the elmination of the middlemen publishers/distributors then the creator reaps the ENTIRE reward of what is being offered by the Library. Let's say an artist creates a (...) (23 years ago, 24-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Possession
|
| (...) I would like to see a revolution in the entire entertainment field based on something like this. Instead of paying an actor 20 mil to make a picture, pay the actor(s) based on the revenue that the motion picture makes (a la Nicolson in (...) (23 years ago, 24-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Possession
|
| (...) Well, there's even more to it than that. Whether retail outlet or library, real world buildings as stores of information provide jobs for a whole plethora of other people: salesclerks, maintenance persons, cashiers, librarians, contractors, (...) (23 years ago, 22-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Possession
|
| "Christopher Weeks" <clweeks@eclipse.net> wrote in message news:HGvwK1.wIv@lugnet.com... (...) library (...) media to (...) charge (...) licensed (...) case. (...) were (...) and into (...) not (...) could (...) user) (...) works (...) would (...) (...) (23 years ago, 22-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Possession
|
| (...) Do IP rights have to be bought the way they are now? The reason this library idea is very cool is because it follows the law of today, yet gets more media to more people...right? Why not just set up this giant media database but charge (...) (23 years ago, 22-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
|
