To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 21363
21362  |  21364
Subject: 
Re: Swift was Right! (He just named the wrong people...)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 19 Jun 2003 17:21:28 GMT
Viewed: 
2546 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
   In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys wrote:
   In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Richard Marchetti wrote:

snip

   Guys like Shrub would nuke people in the U.S. if such a preemptive strike where necessary to maintain political power -- and I don’t really mean Shrub, I mean the guys standing all around him and even more particularly the ones standing in the shadows (the ones whose names are barely known and only whispered even when they are known).

-- Hop-Frog

There it is. Koresh wannabe. We’re done.

“Koresh wannabe” ??? Oh, get over yourself.

Koresh was innocent of anything except bad judgement in thinking that he and his followers could peaceably coexist in the local community, and bad judgement in thinking that because he had good relations with the local law enforcement and because he minded his own business, that was enough to protect him from the greater evil afoot in the nation.

He was guilty, however, of underestimating the evil of the BATF and of the Attorney General of the time. (1) THEY went in, guns blazing, with a secret warrant that didn’t actually specify anything, and then maneuvered to massacre the innocents after demonstrating there was no way that the Davidians were going to get a fair trial.

When you throw around terms like “Koresh wannabe”, you demonstrate that you lack a grasp of how bad things actually are down here. Successive administrations have run amuck to greater and greater extents, aided and abetted by people like you who mean well, but apparently don’t think for themselves very well, and don’t understand that freedom isn’t free.

I don’t normally speak up in defense of Marchetti, but from what I’ve seen in this long (2) thread he gets the point of what the US is supposed to be about, gets the point of what Jefferson and the other fathers were on about, and gets the point of the Bill of Rights... and you don’t. Worse, you disparage it all as meaningless, oldfashioned, no longer relevant, and illogical. What a shame.

I may think Richard’s specific arguments about Halliburton et al are not where the big problems in the country lie, and I may even laugh at some of his specific conspiracy theories, but he’s more of a patriot(3) and more of a freedom lover than you are.

By far.

1 - to think I used to think Reno was the worst AG ever, and it couldn’t get worse. I was half right... She was, at the time. I was also half wrong... Ashcroft is worse, far worse.

2 - and rehashed... everything I’ve seen here so far has been said before, over and over, in the past...

3 - neglecting that you don’t live in the US... but I would argue that you are less of a Canadian patriot than you think.

++Lar

And yet I’m the one attributed to the guy with the beard with the sign ‘the end is near’.

I’m not the one that has to get over myself. I’m not the one who doesn’t understand society at large. Narrow minded people who justify their irrational fears are the ones we have to be concerned about. They’re the ones who ‘take matters into their own hands’ at the least provocation. And yet, they’re also the ones that want guns.

You can’t point out the fallacy of their arguements because they don’t want to understand. They’ve built their little delusional world with paranoid rhetoric and, as such, justify their own actions:


  
  
   Guys like Shrub would nuke people in the U.S. if such a preemptive strike where necessary to maintain political power -- and I don’t really mean Shrub, I mean the guys standing all around him and even more particularly the ones standing in the shadows (the ones whose names are barely known and only whispered even when they are known).


Well, I happen to see humanity as bigger than that. Whereas some look with fear and paranoia, I look with clearer and better eyes than that.

You can’t debate with someone who can’t or doesn’t want to understand that.

Therefore I’m done.

Dave K



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Swift was Right! (He just named the wrong people...)
 
(...) So do I, as whole. I'm talking about Shrub -- a guy that has the whole world on the edge of it's collective seat. Who'll be next in our drive towards empire? Who's going to be preemptively nuked? I'm supposed to think that world is a great (...) (21 years ago, 19-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
  Re: Swift was Right! (He just named the wrong people...)
 
(...) Humanity, yes. Most people are good and kind and honest and want only to live their lives unmolested, living by the golden rule or by the wiccan rule or by libertarian principles (even if they can't articulate any of them clearly, that's still (...) (21 years ago, 19-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Swift was Right! (He just named the wrong people...)
 
(...) "Koresh wannabe" ??? Oh, get over yourself. Koresh was innocent of anything except bad judgement in thinking that he and his followers could peaceably coexist in the local community, and bad judgement in thinking that because he had good (...) (21 years ago, 19-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

161 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR