 | | Re: Saudi Arabia is starting to "Get it" —John Neal
|
| | | (...) Will you characterize any source with which you disagree as a "rag"? (...) Tangental. (...) The point is that it *isn't* the US and Israel for Muslims. I would say that the root of Islamic terrorism (and the evil in this war on terrorism) is (...) (22 years ago, 21-May-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Saudi Arabia is starting to "Get it" —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | | | (...) I think that first sentence is an overstatement. Israel does not have clean hands, nor does the U.S. We are not as bad as some, but we are hardly innocent any longer. In fact, we (the U.S.) are brazenly guilty of atrocities. The U.S. operates (...) (22 years ago, 21-May-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Saudi Arabia is starting to "Get it" —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | (...) That is a generalisation. A few years ago I would have disagreed with it strongly, but day-by-day your great country is moving further and further down that path. Scott A (...) (22 years ago, 22-May-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Saudi Arabia is starting to "Get it" —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) You assume I disagree? (...) I'll take that as a "no". I must confess to liking this: (URL) (...) Do you have any evidance which supports that? WW2 was largly a christian effort; the result was 60 million dead. Extreme interpretations of Islam (...) (22 years ago, 21-May-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
