 | | Re: For Sean... —John Neal
|
| | | (...) The Wild won!!!...!!! (...) Game 7! How could they do this period????? (...) Lessee, who is next for my Wild (Man I hate team names that aren't plurals:-/)... the Canucks! >;^D (...) Wanna make a friendly US-Canadian wager? :-) JOHN (21 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: For Sean... —David Koudys
|
| | | | | (...) Again, if I were a hockey fan I might know fer sure who was still innit. I grew up in a sea of hockey fans so all my info is thru them. I think the Sens are still in and I know the Canucks are. So Vancouver or Ottawa--two teams i don't have (...) (21 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: For Sean... —Sean Devolites
|
| | | | | | (...) Ottawas a good one. They played well even when they weren't being payed at all. Now thats cool. (...) Dallas Stars to be exact. Yea, that would be cool, but id love to see the Ducks vs. Wild. (...) Yep. (...) Hasta la Vista, Sean (21 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: For Sean... —Sean Devolites
|
| | | | | (...) YEA! (...) Good question. This surprised me just as much as the ducks...THE DUCKS, beating the red wings. Im tellin ya, its the year of the underdog. (...) I wish the capitals were still in it, a home team to go for. But no, they had to blow a (...) (21 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: For Sean... —Ryan Wilhelm
|
| | | | Hey all- Speaking as an ex-Minnesotan, GO WILD!! GO WILD!! Ry out (21 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: For Sean... —Kyle McDonald
|
| | | | Actually aren't there a ton of topics to debate in sports? How about: The pros and cons of the designated hitter? Whether or not lowering the pitchers mound has given batters an advantage? The pros/cons of Instant replay in the NFL? The Tuck rule? (...) (21 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: For Sean... —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | | (...) Real baseball players stand out in the field. Reggie Jackson would turn trying to catch even the simpliest routine fly ball into an adventure. (...) Give the batters a mound - we have a mound gap! (...) First incarnation was terrible, the (...) (21 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: For Sean... —Jason Maxwell
|
| | | | (...) Real baseball players bat. Mark Mulder turns swinging a bat into an adventure. In other words, the DH is as legit as AL pitching and/or relief pitching. BTW Edgar Martinez for the Hall of Fame (Once he retires)! (...) Agreed. (...) Legit call (...) (21 years ago, 25-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: For Sean... —Pedro Silva
|
| | | | (...) Worse than that: it's too prone to mistakes. It'd be good if instant replay systems were introduced for the 4th referee, so he could assist the main referee on the more dubious cases. Then again, the mistakes are also part of the game... :-/ (...) (21 years ago, 25-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: For Sean... —Sean Devolites
|
| | | | (...) Another thing about instant replay, its' annoying when they spend so long on what seems like a simple call. No ordering pizzas. Another thing is they need to make some rules simpler. The tuck rule i beleive is the one which helped the Patriots (...) (21 years ago, 26-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
