 | | Re: Heres a debate question for ya...
|
|
(...) How is this a safety valve may i ask? (...) True, but wouldn't debating thru emails work better? (...) True, but it be good to see something lego wise from them. (...) Yep, dats basically it. (...) Cool. (...) I care....because i care. (...) (22 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Heres a debate question for ya...
|
|
(...) "Little things"? "Sport debates"? Talk about inverted priorities...what are you, 12? -- Hop-Frog (22 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Heres a debate question for ya...
|
|
(...) Actually, 14. : ) And you say _I_ have inverted priorities? I mean, I'd so much rather uselessly run my mouth about something I'll make sense in rather than something political and making a fool of myself... Or have I done that already? (...) (...) (22 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Heres a debate question for ya...
|
|
(...) Actually Richard, that was a damned assumptive remark. Like some at .debate argue about everything from politics to lego to religion, there are those out there that would rather argue about affairs revolving around sports, cars and movies. So (...) (22 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Heres a debate question for ya...
|
|
(...) Hey, he has his opinions and I have my own. If he can encompass discussions of world politics with the words "little things," I think I am allowed to express an opinion on that comment. As has been commented before: don't like what you read in (...) (22 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Heres a debate question for ya...
|
|
(...) While is it true that world politics take far more importance over anything else of the sort, I won't go the the extent to demean those whom veer from that discussion. Well, to each his own, I surmise. (...) Yes, the pressure does compound (...) (22 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Heres a debate question for ya...
|
|
(...) The reason (if I understand correctly) for having the entire "off-topic" group was for 'safety valve' issues. Otherwise, debates like this that *naturally* creep up inside of on-topic posts would have nowhere to go. You might argue that they (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
