 | | Re: Break Out the Cristal (trickle-down economics explained with champagne!) —David Koudys
|
| | | (...) Is this 'payment' to a "revamped" UN dependant on number of citizens in the country? GNP? Or just a flat rate? What payment scale would you set up to a 'better' United Nations so that all countries would be represented fairly? (22 years ago, 1-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Break Out the Cristal (trickle-down economics explained with champagne!) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Everyone pays whatever they want and then votes in direct proportion to how much they paid in order to decide what to do. So to implement the onion-vision all the US has to do is pay 51% (and that will work as long as the whole rest of the (...) (22 years ago, 1-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Break Out the Cristal (trickle-down economics explained with champagne!) —David Koudys
|
| | | | (...) It is broken--that much you convinced me (though it didn't take too long a trip for me to see that...) But, again, just brainstorming here... Price per citizen, or any other scale of paying, tends to favour capitalist societies ("western"), (...) (22 years ago, 1-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Break Out the Cristal (trickle-down economics explained with champagne!) —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) Relate it to GDP. That way everyone gives as much as they can afford... sort of like income tax. Scott A (22 years ago, 2-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
