Subject:
|
Re: Just Teasing, I Have No Intention of Debating Any of This...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 21 Mar 2003 11:51:40 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
445 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Spencer Nowak writes:
> Show me hard evidence that proves we are only there for oil.
So, I wonder why you require "hard" evidence for one side of the coin, but such
amazingly soft (ie clearly fabricated) evidence for the other.
> otherwise i
> will regard you as just another empty-headed anti-war protester jumping on
> the no blood for oil bandwagon for lack of a better objection....
What better objection could there be? You are essentially claiming that blood
is a fine currency for the purchase of oil. Well that's fine if it's your
blood, but I'm not sure where you get off spending mine.
Chris
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
164 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
