 | | Re: Gulf of understanding is mutual —Dave Schuler
|
| | | (...) We all accept that the election is over (thank you, Papa Bush, Jeb, Katherine, and Dubya), but what Conservatives don't seem to recognize is that Dubya was not elected by a majority. I can accept that we have a president who was appointed to (...) (22 years ago, 19-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Gulf of understanding is mutual —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | | | (...) Take the Oreos, Cremewiches are where it's at! And how dare you criticize President Bush during a war! You are failing to support our troops, you traitor tot! America, love it or leave it; impeach Earl Warren; reverse discrimination; liberal (...) (22 years ago, 19-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Gulf of understanding is mutual —John Neal
|
| | | | | | (...) -->Bruce<-- you are finally coming around! ;-) JOHN (22 years ago, 19-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Gulf of understanding is mutual —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) ?? Do you mean the UN? Seeing the back of that morally relativistic failed talk society as a force in the world is about the only good that will come of this whole mess. (URL) (22 years ago, 19-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Gulf of understanding is mutual —David Koudys
|
| | | | (...) institution I imagined it was... As this crisis continues, I am fast coming to the same conclusions Larry has been posting about where the UN is concerned. Keep up the postings Larry. Dave K (22 years ago, 19-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
