 | | Liberalism: "Trojan-horse fascism without the jackboots"? [was What has to be the worst...]
|
|
(...) This story made it to the Guardian front page today: Thousands of Americans want to oust their president. The anti-war one, that is (URL) is under pressure to sack him from its hit show or face a boycott or withdrawal of advertising. Sheen (...) (22 years ago, 4-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Liberalism: "Trojan-horse fascism without the jackboots"? [was What has to be the worst...]
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes: <snip> (...) Was on CNN.com yesterday, basically saying the same thing in the article above (URL) this one has a quotation from the NBC spokesperson: " But NBC spokeswoman Rebecca Marks told The (...) (22 years ago, 4-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Liberalism: "Trojan-horse fascism without the jackboots"? [was What has to be the worst...]
|
|
After doing some 'brief' research... I just get more and more set that people are idiots (part 3). I'd include myself in this category 'cause I have done and said some very stupid things... but in here, in o-t.d we throw around ideas, we discuss, we (...) (22 years ago, 4-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Liberalism: "Trojan-horse fascism without the jackboots"? [was What has to be the worst...]
|
|
HeyHEyHEY! (...) Quotes from The Princess Bride DO NOT belong in political debate. Don't you go ruining one of my favorite movies ;-) -- Tom Stangl ***(URL) Visual FAQ home ***(URL) Bay Area DSMs (22 years ago, 4-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Liberalism: "Trojan-horse fascism without the jackboots"? [was What has to be the worst...]
|
|
(...) Oops, thought I hid that one better... Inconceivable! Dave K (22 years ago, 4-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | shut up and take a seat
|
|
(...) You mean like what Jacques Chirac told the new Europeans the other day? (URL) is not well brought up behavior," Mr. Chirac said. "They missed a good opportunity to keep quiet." (22 years ago, 4-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: shut up and take a seat
|
|
(...) Agreed! Chirac was out of line with that statement. I know a few Canadian political snafus in the recent months have also landed folks in hot water. We can't tell *anyone* that they don't have a voice. That's the thing about 'freedom of (...) (22 years ago, 4-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
