To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 1887
1886  |  1888
Subject: 
Cra pollution[ was: Re: Conversation w/ a LEGO Rep]
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Sat, 28 Aug 1999 02:03:30 GMT
Viewed: 
1670 times
  
'Despite several searches, I can't find the message this is supposed
to be in reply to - so I'll just have to start a new thread]

Environment-friendly as it may seem, insane gasoline taxes to
subsidize inefficient public transport do not reduce pollution
per se.

True. You really need three things for that. [1] High petrol taxes,
[2] Decent public transport, and [3] A Government that's prepared
to risk some unpopularity by telling people bluntly about the problems
caused by overuse of cars, and taking measures to encourage people
to use alternative transport and to save energy.

And despite the increased gas consumption caused by emission-control
devices, I'd say gas mileage on cars (I can't speak for SUVs that
are trucks by law) here is pretty good, too.
What's your average large family saloon (Granada 2.9, maybe?)
use?

Most modern cars in the UK are *claimed* by the manufacturers to do
40-45 mpg. A few years ago it started being illegal to make a new
car without fitting a catalytic converter. Every year, all cars over 3 years
old
have to be checked for safety (the 'MOT') - and the checks include quite
strict
emissions tests. The Government is also in the process of changing the way
cars are taxed so that you have to pay less for ones with smaller engines.
(Frustratingly, my car is 1117cc, which is just 17cc too big to qualify for
the
lower tax!)

How does that compare with the USA?

Simon
http://www.SimonRobinson.com



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Cra pollution[ was: Re: Conversation w/ a LEGO Rep]
 
Simon Robinson wrote in message <016301bef0f9$aed3ed...co.net>... (...) years (...) Not like you seem to think. First, catalytic convertors have been required for over 20 years (is that what you mean by a few?). Second many states have emissions (...) (25 years ago, 28-Aug-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Conversation w/ a LEGO Rep
 
(...) Environment-friendly as it may seem, insane gasoline taxes to subsidize inefficient public transport do not reduce pollution per se. Despite low gas prices, pollution here has been reduced quite a bit since the introduction of emmissions (...) (25 years ago, 25-Aug-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

276 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR