Subject:
|
Re: IGNORANT views fuel oppression?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 11 Dec 2002 17:43:13 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2149 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
>
> Barak's offer was empty (it had to be ratified in a referendum). He knew
> Arafat could not accept it. Even so, what stopped Barak from making a better
> offer? What right does Israel have to the West Bank, Gaza or Jerusalem
> anyway? Does SH not have equal rights over Kuwait?
>
> >
> > > > Israel *can* be reasonable, *does* want
> > > > peace, and have *proven* this. The PA is populated with those that *don't*
> > > > want peace, *want* instability, and *desire* the destruction of the State of
> > > > Israel. The *Palestinians* are the ones who need to clean house first here,
> > > > just as Egypt got her act together *first*.
> > >
> > > Who wrecked Oslo / Oslo II? Why?
> >
> > Who indeed. It merely exemplifies the need for Israel to be negogiating with
> > those who actually desire peace instead of seeking more step in the
> > destroy-Israel agenda.
>
> Answer the question. Netanyahu ripped up Olso/Oslo II using a wafer thin
> majority.
Former U.S. President Jimmy Carter yesterday:
"At Camp David in 1978 and in Oslo in 1993, Israelis, Egyptians, and
Palestinians have endorsed the only reasonable prescription for peace: United
Nations Resolution 242... It condemns the acquisition of territory by force,
calls for withdrawal of Israel from the occupied territories, and provides for
Israelis to live securely and in harmony with their neighbors. There is no
other mandate whose implementation could more profoundly improve international
relationships.... War may sometimes be a necessary evil, but no matter how
necessary, it is always an evil, never a good. We will not learn how to live
together in peace by killing each other's children..."
...but the news networks are already in Iraq.
Scott A
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: IGNORANT views fuel oppression?
|
| (...) I propose an OT-D Resolution 001-- In which all party(s) concerned, concurrently and without delay withdraw from specifically discussing the Israel/Palestine issue for a term of at least, but not limited to, one (1) month. This resolution is (...) (22 years ago, 11-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: IGNORANT views fuel oppression?
|
| (...) I agree that Sinai is a large lump of land. However, it was [reluctantly] handed back to *Egypt* - not the *Palestinians*. (...) Barak's offer was empty (it had to be ratified in a referendum). He knew Arafat could not accept it. Even so, what (...) (22 years ago, 30-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
205 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
