|
|
 | | Re: The Brick Testament parts the Red Sea
|
| Rev, I think you need to get working on fleshing out the Good Book of Maury. Sounds like a hoot. Then again, all you'd have to do is change a few words/names/phrases across the Bible, and it would probably work well enough. But if you take some real (...) (23 years ago, 4-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: The Brick Testament parts the Red Sea
|
| (...) Sure, jump in! There's a reason we're debating in a public forum and not just over e-mail. (...) OK, so would you say his first covenant, that of the Old Testament, could be accurately summed up by "Israelites, do what I say, or I will kill (...) (23 years ago, 4-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: The Brick Testament parts the Red Sea
|
| I can answer much of this, including your examples, (though you may call it my opinion), but I wanted to ask before I interrupt someone else's debate. It may be of interest that like many christians I stand by the *whole* old testemant and of (...) (23 years ago, 4-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: The Brick Testament parts the Red Sea
|
| (...) Hey all. Huge long thread here that sprang up while I was away. I'm tempted to respond to about every other post, but fear it's a fruitless quagmire. Rather than hit any of the theological points of issue, I just wanted to address this one, (...) (23 years ago, 4-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Also seen on CNN
|
| (...) It's the cream of the jest. -->Bruce<-- (23 years ago, 3-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
|
