Subject:
|
Re: The Brick Testament parts the Red Sea
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 27 Nov 2002 23:50:32 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1664 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Jon Palmer writes:
> Ok "superstition" was a bit harsh. I should have said "belief". But I
> seriously do still stand by my opinion of how rediculous it is to completely
> discount something for it's artistic merit, just because the artist
> seemingly believes something different than you. I read it as:
> Oh he likes my God! This is great!
> (then)
> Wait, he doesn't like my God at all. Thats terrible!
I think what he felt was betrayal and a sense of being lied to. If he had
known going in that it was mockery, his reaction IMO would have been different.
I really don't care about someone's paticular beliefs when I view their MOC,
unless their MOC is a commentary *about* *my* beliefs (and especially *not*
about theirs)-- I think that is a different scenario.
Interestingly, if BPS should decide to recreate stories in the Koran, he could
well find himself *actually* condemned to death by some Muslim leaders! Better
he should stick to the easy target of check-turning Christians....
-John
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: The Brick Testament parts the Red Sea
|
| "Jon Palmer" <jon@zemi.net> wrote in message news:H691K8.CJH@lugnet.com... (...) Ok "superstition" was a bit harsh. I should have said "belief". But I seriously do still stand by my opinion of how rediculous it is to completely discount something (...) (22 years ago, 27-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
205 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
