Subject:
|
Re: The Brick Testament parts the Red Sea
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 27 Nov 2002 19:42:45 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1741 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Jon Palmer writes:
> "Ronald Scott Moody" <uberwindin@earthlink.net> wrote in message
> news:H689GH.609@lugnet.com...
> > >
> > > Well that's certainly ONE view of what he's doing, yes. Please forgive me
> > > for snickering out loud when I read the above paragraph, though. Ronald, • you
> > > may want to check your assumptions a lot more carefully before you • proclaim
> > > that you're sure you know what Brendan's motives were.
> > >
> > > FUT ought to go somewhere else I suppose, so I set it to o-t.debate
> >
> > I had no clue what else he had on the rest of his page. I would never • have
> > thought that someone would put something up religeous in nature in a maner
> > such as I interpreted the Brick Testament on one page and then the kind of
> > discusting and revolting content on another. I tend to take things at • face
> > value and not look for the bad in things. Hard lesson to learn I supose.
> > My fault for being so gulable and childlike. This entire thing has turned
> > out to be a bit of an insult and a let down. I just hope my teacher did • not
> > go to that page. I don't know what Brendan's motives are, I only know • that
> > I looked at it as a way to honor God. I guess next time I see something
> > that looks like a good relegious venture, I will have to start looking to
> > tear it down and pick it apart before I can take it for what I would like
> > for it to be.
>
> Fundies rock. Lets just disregard all creative aspects of Brendan's work
> because his views don't mesh perfectly with your particular superstition.
>
> Great work as usual Brendan.
>
> -Jon (laughing on his way back out of .debate)
> --
> | The Shipyard - http://zemi.net/shipyard
> | The Moonbase Project - http://www.classic-space.com/moonbase/start/
> | My Lego Creations - http://zemi.net/lego
> | Attack of the Bricks - http://www.bricklink.com/store.asp?p=jpalmer
Athiests rock! They have a way of belittling anyone and anything that
doesn't fit into their worldview!
Quoteth Larry
"
Well that's certainly ONE view of what he's doing, yes. Please forgive me
for snickering out loud when I read the above paragraph
"
(though, to be said, Larry did put in the apology before the snicker)
Quoteth Jon (from above)
"
> Fundies rock. Lets just disregard all creative aspects of Brendan's work
> because his views don't mesh perfectly with your particular superstition.
"
Let's just disregard Jon's post because his view doesn't mesh perfectly well
with my particular superstition. Wait! That's condescending and belittling.
To me anyway, it sounds much like a bunch of immature kids who set the paper
bag full of doggy doo on fire on the porch and ring the bell and take off,
hide, and watch what'll happen--"Oh can't wait to see the look on the owners
face!" <snicker> "Boy will *he* be surprised!" <snicker>
Now if someone could have been polite, and not condescending, and mentioned
to Scott that, hey, not all is as it appears (valiant effort by Larry until
the snicker), well that would have been a much better way of handling it.
Again, the flip side, Scotts post in response to this,
Quoteth Scott:
"
I had no clue what else he had on the rest of his page. I would never have
thought that someone would put something up religeous in nature in a maner
such as I interpreted the Brick Testament on one page and then the kind of
discusting and revolting content on another. I tend to take things at face
value and not look for the bad in things. Hard lesson to learn I supose.
My fault for being so gulable and childlike. This entire thing has turned
out to be a bit of an insult and a let down. I just hope my teacher did not
go to that page. I don't know what Brendan's motives are, I only know that
I looked at it as a way to honor God. I guess next time I see something
that looks like a good relegious venture, I will have to start looking to
tear it down and pick it apart before I can take it for what I would like
for it to be.
"
was a little harsh. Forgivable? Well, he felt as if he was 'burned' but I,
personally, would have written the experience off as 'live and learn'. As a
Christian growing up in this day and age, it should come as second nature to
have a discernment process in place where everything is concerned. Is Scott
a 'fundy'? Mayhaps. We don't know. Making wise-ass comments like Jon's
isn't going to help the situation though, is it?
Dave! perhaps had the best contribution,
Quoteth Dave!
"
That's a reasonable position to take, but I urge you not to limit your
careful analysis simply to new ideas; there's no reason not to subject one's
pre-existing views to that same kind of critical examination.
"
-Build people up, don't tear them down.
-Take the high road, don't get bogged down in the mire where there will be
"weeping and gnashing of teeth".
Anyway, 'nuff said.
Dave K.
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: The Brick Testament parts the Red Sea
|
| (...) Well, if it makes Scott feel any better, I failed to see the joke a year ago: (URL) in my defense I seem to recall that the stories illustrated in LEGO up to that time were less satirical than they later became. That's not to say that the (...) (22 years ago, 27-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | Re: The Brick Testament parts the Red Sea
|
| (...) Easy there, tiger. I was snickering at the rather credulous and wide eyed statement (unfortunately snipped, but worth rereading) that Ronald Scott Moody initially made, not his particular worldview. Such charming naivety is, well... lauguable, (...) (22 years ago, 27-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: The Brick Testament parts the Red Sea
|
| "Ronald Scott Moody" <uberwindin@earthlink.net> wrote in message news:H689GH.609@lugnet.com... (...) you (...) proclaim (...) have (...) face (...) not (...) that (...) Fundies rock. Lets just disregard all creative aspects of Brendan's work because (...) (22 years ago, 27-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
205 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
