To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 18376
18375  |  18377
Subject: 
Re: The Brick Testament parts the Red Sea
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Wed, 27 Nov 2002 09:09:53 GMT
Viewed: 
1424 times
  

Well that's certainly ONE view of what he's doing, yes. Please forgive me
for snickering out loud when I read the above paragraph, though. Ronald, you
may want to check your assumptions a lot more carefully before you proclaim
that you're sure you know what Brendan's motives were.

FUT ought to go somewhere else I suppose, so I set it to o-t.debate

I had no clue what else he had on the rest of his page.  I would never have
thought that someone would put something up religeous in nature in a maner
such as I interpreted the Brick Testament on one page and then the kind of
discusting and revolting content on another.  I tend to take things at face
value and not look for the bad in things.  Hard lesson to learn I supose.
My fault for being so gulable and childlike.  This entire thing has turned
out to be a bit of an insult and a let down.  I just hope my teacher did not
go to that page.  I don't know what Brendan's motives are, I only know that
I looked at it as a way to honor God.  I guess next time I see something
that looks like a good relegious venture, I will have to start looking to
tear it down and pick it apart before I can take it for what I would like
for it to be.



Message has 4 Replies:
  Re: The Brick Testament parts the Red Sea
 
(...) That's a reasonable position to take, but I urge you not to limit your careful analysis simply to new ideas; there's no reason not to subject one's pre-existing views to that same kind of critical examination. Dave! (22 years ago, 27-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: The Brick Testament parts the Red Sea
 
snip (...) snip Scott, Brendan's site is religious in nature but it is not christian. I hope for your sake you stayed out of the new testament. Sometimes slight and other times not so slight mockery of God can be found in every story. I too collect (...) (22 years ago, 27-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: The Brick Testament parts the Red Sea
 
"Ronald Scott Moody" <uberwindin@earthlink.net> wrote in message news:H689GH.609@lugnet.com... (...) you (...) proclaim (...) have (...) face (...) not (...) that (...) Fundies rock. Lets just disregard all creative aspects of Brendan's work because (...) (22 years ago, 27-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: The Brick Testament parts the Red Sea
 
(...) "discusting and revolting"? I'll have to assume, for lack of you being specific, that you're talking about the content on my personal website TheReverend.com, but it's anyone's guess just what it is you find so "discusting and revolting". Is (...) (22 years ago, 28-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: The Brick Testament parts the Red Sea
 
(...) Well that's certainly ONE view of what he's doing, yes. Please forgive me for snickering out loud when I read the above paragraph, though. Ronald, you may want to check your assumptions a lot more carefully before you proclaim that you're sure (...) (22 years ago, 26-Nov-02, to lugnet.build.ancient, lugnet.off-topic.debate)

205 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR