Subject:
|
Re: Not the Green party...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 10 Oct 2002 15:06:34 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
441 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Maggie Cambron writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, William R. Ward writes:
> > > > http://www.cnn.com/2002/US/Central/10/02/candidate.blue.skin.ap/
> > > > I like a candidate who knows a nostrum when he sees it! If Browne can't do
> > > > it, maybe blue can!
> >
> > > I'm sorely tempted to make a wisecrack about what this says about the
> > > intelligence of libertarians, but I will refrain.
> > >
> > > Colloidal silver, indeed.
> >
> > Now, now! I'm far from a Libertarian apologist, but even I recognize the
> > folly of judging a group by the silliness of one (or a few) of its members
> > (though it may be a lot of fun!). It's much more rhetorically sound to
> > address the tenets of a group, whatever they might be.
> > And anyway I'm actually more worried that this fellow conceived his
> > plan as a safeguard against some sort of Y2K technopocalypse.
>
> You're right, Dave! We should stick to pertinent topics propounded
> by the Libertarians. I mean, what Californian could forget candidate
> for Lt. Gov. Pat Wright's pet issue?
>
> http://news.lugnet.com/off-topic/fun/?n=9053
>
> Maggie C.
So, I'll be able to walk the dog, the cat, the bird, AND the ferret?!? Oh
no.....
Bruce
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Not the Green party...
|
| (...) You're right, Dave! We should stick to pertinent topics propounded by the Libertarians. I mean, what Californian could forget candidate for Lt. Gov. Pat Wright's pet issue? (URL) C. (22 years ago, 10-Oct-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
12 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
