Subject:
|
Re: Not the Green party...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 10 Oct 2002 02:16:48 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
414 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, William R. Ward writes:
> > http://www.cnn.com/2002/US/Central/10/02/candidate.blue.skin.ap/
> > I like a candidate who knows a nostrum when he sees it! If Browne can't do
> > it, maybe blue can!
> I'm sorely tempted to make a wisecrack about what this says about the
> intelligence of libertarians, but I will refrain.
>
> Colloidal silver, indeed.
Now, now! I'm far from a Libertarian apologist, but even I recognize the
folly of judging a group by the silliness of one (or a few) of its members
(though it may be a lot of fun!). It's much more rhetorically sound to address
the tenets of a group, whatever they might be.
And anyway I'm actually more worried that this fellow conceived his plan as a
safeguard against some sort of Y2K technopocalypse.
Dave!
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Not the Green party...
|
| (...) You're right, Dave! We should stick to pertinent topics propounded by the Libertarians. I mean, what Californian could forget candidate for Lt. Gov. Pat Wright's pet issue? (URL) C. (22 years ago, 10-Oct-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
12 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
