 | | Re: world mandate (Re: Why start with Iraq? - (Re: Iraq, Dictators, and Peace)) —Christopher L. Weeks
| | | | (...) What exactly are you looking for, certain verbiage? Come off it. Chris (22 years ago, 30-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: world mandate (Re: Why start with Iraq? - (Re: Iraq, Dictators, and Peace)) —Scott Arthur
| | | | | | (...) Not quite, but that would nice. :) The quote above only tells us that Bruce is against a "unilateral attack on Iraq", not that Bruce does not share Bushes selfish unilateral outlook as far as the wider world is concerned. The difference is (...) (22 years ago, 30-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: world mandate (Re: Why start with Iraq? - (Re: Iraq, Dictators, and Peace)) —Bruce Schlickbernd
| | | | | (...) Just ignore him. We both now he'll never concede anything. The guy has no shame. Bruce (22 years ago, 30-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: world mandate (Re: Why start with Iraq? - (Re: Iraq, Dictators, and Peace)) —Scott Arthur
| | | | | (...) A dodge? You mean you don't want to explain your bunker-buster comment, tell us what the USA's official response to SH gassing his own people was, why you want to view Iraq in isolation or even what is “all Britain's fault”? Scott A (...) (22 years ago, 30-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | |
