Subject:
|
Re: Those stupid liberal judges are at it again!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 24 Sep 2002 23:30:33 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1548 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Richie Dulin writes:
> > And just who is it that the militia is supposed to be well regulated by,
> > anyway?
>
> By the individual members.
I wonder how this does/would work in practice. Regulation of an armed body
by individuals would not appear to be too effective.
For instance, do you see, in a time of crisis in the US, a militia
sponteneously arising from its citizenry, and, leaderless, restoring
democracy to the country?
Who decides when to storm the White House?
Or if there is a leader of the militia, how is he or she to be appointed?
(Democratically electing a militia leader in a time a crisis would seem to
be a bit of a drain on resources...)
Cheers
Richie
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Those stupid liberal judges are at it again!
|
| (...) But regulation doesn't mean directing. The militia doesn't need government direction, that's what the army is for (even if it shouldn't be). (...) I expect that a chain of command of some kind would evolve. (...) Each of us. (...) There isn't (...) (22 years ago, 25-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Those stupid liberal judges are at it again!
|
| (...) militia? Well, I think the duty part is Larry's opinion. One that I vaguely share, but I certainly wouldn't hold people to. It's just that we think more highly of people who fully participate in the way of American governance. There are lots (...) (22 years ago, 24-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
220 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
