Subject:
|
Re: Those stupid liberal judges are at it again!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 24 Sep 2002 16:14:28 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1523 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd writes:
>
> > It says "the security of a free state", not "the maintaining of a free state
> > from internal tyrants" or even "securing a free state". It's a long reach
> > to place your interpretation on the law as written.
>
> Yes, but Mike's interpretation is supported by a thousand documents from the
> time.
You weren't paying attention to earlier messages. The law *as written*. If
you want to move onto later claims, that's another story.
> Why are you folks arguing this? If you don't want guns in America,
> change the constitution (if we let you :-). But what it means is really clear.
Is this addressed to me or the board in general? If me, you are barking up
the wrong tree.
Bruce
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
220 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
