Subject:
|
Re: Those stupid liberal judges are at it again!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 24 Sep 2002 17:50:31 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1430 times
|
| |
|
|
I guess I misunderstood. But unfortunately, I still do.
Chris
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd writes:
> >
> > > It says "the security of a free state", not "the maintaining of a free state
> > > from internal tyrants" or even "securing a free state". It's a long reach
> > > to place your interpretation on the law as written.
> >
> > Yes, but Mike's interpretation is supported by a thousand documents from the
> > time.
>
> You weren't paying attention to earlier messages. The law *as written*. If
> you want to move onto later claims, that's another story.
>
> > Why are you folks arguing this? If you don't want guns in America,
> > change the constitution (if we let you :-). But what it means is really • clear.
>
> Is this addressed to me or the board in general? If me, you are barking up
> the wrong tree.
>
> Bruce
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
220 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
