Subject:
|
Re: Those stupid liberal judges are at it again!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sat, 21 Sep 2002 04:48:12 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1203 times
|
| |
|
|
> Not once has anyone here refuted Nixon leaving office without the sign or
> even *implied threat* of a gun.
So an armed citizenry is not an implied threat?
>
> Not once has anyone here shown that the democratic process, with all its
> problems, doesn't work.
You are completely missing the point. When (not if) the government becomes
corrupt to the point that it is no longer a democracy, it is time for the
people to invoke their second amendment right and reinstate the Constitution as
our basis of goverment. To use your "sandbox" analogy from earlier in this
thread. The gun owners are not the bullies, as you seem to think, but rather
the children who will stop the bully[1] if he decides to try and impose is will
on weaker[2] childeren.
-Mike Petrucelli
[1] read: government, police, and/or military
[2] read: unarmed
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Those stupid liberal judges are at it again!
|
| (...) Well, it was a minor but--semantics--irrelevant to the discussion at hand. An *opinion*, a voice, a discourse is *protected* by the 1st. If I don't like your opinion--my tough cookies, just as if you don't like mine--your tough cookies. (...) (...) (22 years ago, 20-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
220 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
