Subject:
|
Re: Those stupid liberal judges are at it again!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sat, 21 Sep 2002 04:00:27 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1087 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks writes:
> Further, most of the variables that you quoted are inextricably linked to one
> another which leads me to think that accounting for changes in "socioeconomic
> status" and maybe "police funding" of an area across the time of the study
> would make more sense (at least as a first step) than trying to account for
> every niggly little bit of variance.
That's a reasonable objection, but I think the essential point remains
regardless of my incomplete and anecdotal listing, especially remembering the
fact that previous debates here have been disembowelled by pointing out that
"correlation doesn't equal causation." We simply need more data, alas.
Dave!
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
220 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
