 | | Re: American intelligentsia and the American electorate (WAS Re: slight) —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | It seems that there is an agreement between Larry and Scott to not participate in the same threads. Whether this is totally informal, or even fictional, is irrelevent. It's been nice having no sniping between Scott and Larry. Thanks to both of you (...) (22 years ago, 6-Aug-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: American intelligentsia and the American electorate (WAS Re: slight) —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) This is not a snipe(?). Am I not supporting his argument? I can't ever remember agreeing not to "participate in the same threads" as Larry. Further, I am pretty sure he has posted in the same threads as me – he is welcome to. (...) Are John's (...) (22 years ago, 6-Aug-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: American intelligentsia and the American electorate (WAS Re: slight) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Representative? Dunno. I doubt it. I sure hope not! Dominant? They seem to be. The Tennessee constitution, for example, purportedly bars atheists from holding public office. (URL) have not validated that source. (22 years ago, 6-Aug-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
