Debate : 17370


Off-Topic / Debate / 17370	17369 \| 17371

Subject:	Re: American intelligentsia and the American electorate (WAS Re: slight)
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date:	Tue, 6 Aug 2002 11:20:11 GMT
Viewed:	2053 times

It seems that there is an agreement between Larry and Scott to not participate in the same threads. Whether this is totally informal, or even fictional, is irrelevent. It's been nice having no sniping between Scott and Larry. Thanks to both of you for the restraint! But this note worries me... In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes: > So does Dawkins have it right? Does intolerance mean that religious freedoms > are being curtailed by the unsophisticated Christians masses? Well, yes. Didn't you read the thread. John, et al, want the right not to practice religion curtailed. It's commonplace. Is it really nonexistant over there? Chris

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: American intelligentsia and the American electorate (WAS Re: slight)
(...) This is not a snipe(?). Am I not supporting his argument? I can't ever remember agreeing not to "participate in the same threads" as Larry. Further, I am pretty sure he has posted in the same threads as me – he is welcome to. (...) Are John's (...) (22 years ago, 6-Aug-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:

		American intelligentsia and the American electorate (WAS Re: slight)
(...) I admit it, I was not impressed with the implied link between rationality, "success", religion and creationism. However, over the weekend I read an item by Richard Dawkins from "Free Inquiry" (see: www.secularhumanism.org). This is the part (...) (22 years ago, 6-Aug-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

225 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search