Debate : 17374


Off-Topic / Debate / 17374	17373 \| 17375

Subject:	Re: American intelligentsia and the American electorate (WAS Re: slight)
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date:	Tue, 6 Aug 2002 12:14:53 GMT
Viewed:	2089 times

In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes: > Are John's view’s really representative? ;) Representative? Dunno. I doubt it. I sure hope not! Dominant? They seem to be. The Tennessee constitution, for example, purportedly bars atheists from holding public office. http://my.execpc.com/~dcoy/PEDS/documents.htm I have not validated that source.

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: American intelligentsia and the American electorate (WAS Re: slight)
(...) This is not a snipe(?). Am I not supporting his argument? I can't ever remember agreeing not to "participate in the same threads" as Larry. Further, I am pretty sure he has posted in the same threads as me – he is welcome to. (...) Are John's (...) (22 years ago, 6-Aug-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

225 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search