To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 1731
1730  |  1732
Subject: 
The nature of the JC god, good or evil? (Was Re: POV-RAY orange color (0)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 20 Aug 1999 14:43:17 GMT
Reply-To: 
lpieniazek@ANTISPAMnovera.com
Viewed: 
1287 times
  
John Neal wrote:

The Bible isn't a proof text.  It's a collection of many different
traditions, most of them oral.  Don't be so "Western Culture, how did it
happen, is it true, what are the facts".

Why not? The scientific method works. Look at the marvels and wonders
it's produced. What lasting contribution to human progress have those
oral traditions given us? (1)

It's because he was more
than just a man, and that his message was so profound.

In what way was he more than a man? (beware of circular arguments) in
what way was his message profound?

Don't you find it a bit ridiculous? "I am more than a mere man. How so?
In ways that you cannot understand. And the fact that you can't
understand them proves my godhead. I understand them but I can't explain
them to you because I would have to use concepts which you cannot grasp.
So there."

IMO Job is one of the most interesting and honest books in the Bible.

Right, because it shows the true nature of your god.

No, Jesus revealed the true nature of God, because only Jesus knew it.

If only Jesus can know it, how can he reveal it to others? Doesn't that
smack you of trying to tell a blind person what sight is like? What's
the point?

Job reflects a frustration at the enigma of God.

No, Job reflects the ultimate cruelty and perverseness of the Old
Testament god. I note that most bibilical scholars agree that god seems
to have changed between testaments. Does he love us more now than he did
before? Are we or are we not to repudiate the OT?

The OT god is not enigmatic, merely capricious, malicious, and self
aggrandizing. I know those traits (especially the last one, as I have it
myself) when I see them. Not a worthy deity for primitives to worship,
much less supposedly educated folk like yourself. I'll take my chances
with Satan if those are my only choices. At least he's just a thug.

So get over this god of yours already.

1 - other than this JudeoChristian religion, which;
A) I don't see as progress, and
B) is a circular argument if you make it, so don't bother.

0 - how's THAT for a subject change?

--
Larry Pieniazek larryp@novera.com  http://my.voyager.net/lar
- - - Web Application Integration! http://www.novera.com
fund Lugnet(tm): http://www.ebates.com/ Member ref: lar, 1/2 $$ to
lugnet.

NOTE: I have left CTP, effective 18 June 99, and my CTP email
will not work after then. Please switch to my Novera ID.



Message has 3 Replies:
  Re: The nature of the JC god, good or evil? (Was Re: POV-RAY orange color (0)
 
Larry Pieniazek <lar@voyager.net> wrote in message news:37BD6985.26585E...ger.net... (...) I think the claim that man could reconcile with God through faith alone and not earn it is new for the time. (...) He didn't say "know," he said "knew." (...) (...) (25 years ago, 21-Aug-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: The nature of the JC god, good or evil? (Was Re: POV-RAY orange color (0)
 
(...) Does the scientific method help me to understand the rules of baseball? A kind of apples and oranges situation, as it is with God and science. You can't define something that is BY DEFINITION undefinable. Try expressing 22/7 as a decimal (I (...) (25 years ago, 22-Aug-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: The nature of the JC god, good or evil? (Was Re: POV-RAY orange color (0)
 
(...) Prozac. (25 years ago, 27-Aug-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: POV-RAY orange color
 
(...) The Bible isn't a proof text. It's a collection of many different traditions, most of them oral. Don't be so "Western Culture, how did it happen, is it true, what are the facts". The fact is that the ancient world didn't care for such things, (...) (25 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

277 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR