Subject:
|
Re: Evolution vs Scientific Creationism
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 11 Jul 2002 21:10:14 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
5289 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys writes:
> And don't make the mistake of saying that evolution is science. Science is
> based on what can be shown today--evolution happened a long time ago.
<...>
> And don't try to teach evolution as science. Science, either biology,
> chemistry, and physics in high school, doesn't have to have *either* theory
> taught at all for the children to succeed in these classes. My
> understanding of a weight falling 9.8 m/s^2 doesn't need either theory.
> Saying that 2H2 + O2 = H20 + energy certainly doesn't need it, and the
> concept of photosynthesis certainly doesn't need either. High school is no
> place for either of these theories to be taught.
<...>
> It is my opinion, true. Just as it is my opinion that evolution has less to
> do with science as it does in forcing a theory of why God doesn't exist on
> the public masses.
Dave, I think you have a fundamental misunderstanding about what
evolutionary theory is. I would encourage you to step back from the
evolution:creation debate, and try and look at the theory of evolution from
within a scientific framework. The theory of evolution has nothing
whatsoever to do with the presence or absence of God (or god or gods or
Yggdrasil's), and if it has been shown to you thusly, it's been misrepresented.
thanks,
James
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Evolution vs Scientific Creationism
|
| (...) Now this is refreshing--'The theory of Evolution' and saying that it has nothing to do with the plausibility of God. For the record, I believe the world to be millions of years old. I believe the universe to be even older. I believe that there (...) (22 years ago, 11-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Evolution vs Scientific Creationism
|
| (...) Once again, the difference is jumping species. Whether it's 2 years or 2 thousand years, or 2 million years, a fish is still a fish. Sure, it adapted over the course of those millions of years to climate changes, grew a new fin to help it (...) (22 years ago, 11-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
395 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
