Subject:
|
Re: Evolution vs Scientific Creationism
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 10 Jul 2002 20:44:29 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4766 times
|
| |
|
|
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dan Boger writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal writes:
> > > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Lindsay Frederick Braun writes:
> > > What is it about evolution that seems so illogical to you?
> > If I may pose a question: Evolution is basically the theory that stuff
> > comes from stuff that came before it. If you take stuff all the way back to
> > the Big Bang (or whatever universe starting event you wish), where logically
> > did *that* stuff come from? At some point, you'd have to acknowledge that
> > some stuff came from nowhere, which seems illogical within the perimeters
> > of evolution (to me, at least).
> but that's not about evolution anymore - it's the origins question, I
> believe.
Hmm. I see your point, but am still a little fuzzy as to the distinction.
Evolution, AFAIK, attempts to trace life back to proteins in a sea of goop, but
then again, I think it would be fair to ask from where the goop came, and so on.
-John
> I think it's ok to say I don't know what happened then, but to me,
> the most logical thing that was before the big bang, was another universe...
> basicly, we have a pulsing universe, that collapses upon itself once in a
> while, resulting in a new big bang each time. and so, to the end of time...
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Evolution vs Scientific Creationism
|
| (...) but that's not about evolution anymore - it's the origins question, I believe. I think it's ok to say I don't know what happened then, but to me, the most logical thing that was before the big bang, was another universe... basicly, we have a (...) (22 years ago, 10-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
395 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
