To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 16883
16882  |  16884
Subject: 
Re: One nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 4 Jul 2002 12:51:50 GMT
Viewed: 
3863 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal writes:

Can you say "pledge ruling"?  I'm not sure that there *can* be an ideal
document-- stuff will always happen that one could never have predicted.

Indeed, but it is important to iron out any imperfections. You constitution
allows political power to be bought and sold. Millionaires can buy
elections. Third parties can run negative campaigns against candidates (eg
NRA). Your embassies are stocked with political donors. I won?t even mention
the plumb book or pork barrelling.

But then you are simply restricting freedoms.  Pretty soon we'd end up like the
UK>;-)


You may feel you are the "freest people in the world", but do black or
Hispanic Americans feel the same? Does their collective lack of economic
power deny them equal access to the political system?

To speak in those terms is IMO racist.

In what respect?

That you mentioned race-- what would that necessarily have to do with anything?

Sure, there will always be those who
are disinfranchised, but it will always cut along the poverty line rather than
the racial one.

You are ignoring reality.

Damn right.  People *need* to start *really* being colorblind, and stop
patronizing "minorities".  *That* is probably more destructive than
discrimination!

The fate of the poor has always been thus.  At least in this
country, the bar for the poor is higher than in any other country.

Really? How many of your countrymen have no healthcare cover? How many millions?

When push comes to shove, people get medical attention.  They may not get a
kidney, but neither may you in your socialistic system.



The fact that we are the greatest economic, military, and cultural
presence on earth is only a testament to that fact, not reasons for it.

Many would argue that the USA has no culture other than consumerism.

Perhaps.  But remember, we've only *been* a culture for 200ish years....

So now you are saying you are not great culturally?

That is pretty hard to quantify-- way, way too subjective.  Put it this way-- I
don't watch TV.  That alienates me from much of Americana alone!

However short that is, we do have quite a rich history already.


I find it interesting that when immigrants come here, they *expect* to be able
to preserve their *former* cultural selves, even their language.  This is quite
a different attitude than, say, 100 years ago.  It tends to divide us rather
than bring us together.  I am not a fan of "diversity" for its own sake--
ironically, find it smacks of racism.

Can forcing your culture on them not also be considered racism?

Who said anything about force?  I'm just saying that 100 years ago people
couldn't try to fit in fast enough.  Today it's the opposite.


We have just as many problems as
anyone else.

So life is not all that ?great? after all?

Yes and no.  Our greatest danger comes in times of prosperity. When things get
really tough, that is when Americans band together best.

I think the past few months of ?danger? has shown the USA at its worst. The
?banding together? has compromised both your rights and the rights of those
who are not part of your happy club. Understand that much John.

Understand this.  Being threatened by nuclear terror is no happy club.  What
will you say when this occurs?  Nobody seems to grasp the gravity of the
situation here.  These Islamic fundamental whackos would do it in a heartbeat,
and all in the name of Allah.

This is war, Scott.  And we all know what the first casualty of war is.  It is
inevitable, especially in such a free society as ours.  But we (all) will
overcome this adversity and be better for it.

-John



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: One nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
 
(...) The past two UK general elections have produced MPs who got to power with virtually no funding. That is freedom. In the UK we limit MP’s political advertising budgets to allow open access to power. The average winning candidate spends about (...) (22 years ago, 4-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: One nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
 
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal writes: <snip> (...) Oh I'm so glad that I'm Canadian with our health care system. Yes there are those union bosses who say otherwise, and people can line up a whole bunch of people whining about the woes of (...) (22 years ago, 4-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: One nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
 
(...) Indeed, but it is important to iron out any imperfections. You constitution allows political power to be bought and sold. Millionaires can buy elections. Third parties can run negative campaigns against candidates (eg NRA). Your embassies are (...) (22 years ago, 4-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

395 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR