To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 16880
16879  |  16881
Subject: 
Re: One nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 4 Jul 2002 11:42:13 GMT
Viewed: 
4219 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys writes:

In many respects the USA is "Great". But so was Goliath. Economically and
Militarly the USA is "great". But, increasingly, it has failed to be morally
"Great".

Yes, you are correct.  I think we are victims of our own success-- freedom has
a price which one must be willing to pay; freedom without responsibility is
anarchy and not freedom at all.

I would have more respect for your scrap of paper if it had given rights to
those who were not white males? but it took a long time to do that. I would
have more respect for you scrap of paper if it gave rights to those held
without charge by your country. I would have  more respect for your scrap of
paper if it had protected political freedoms during the cold war.

Despite my tongue-in-cheek remarks above, I do have a lot of resect for your
constitution. However, it is far from ideal. For example, it has been
complicit in allowing the USA to become the ?greatest democracy money can
buy?.  The constitution should serve and protect (the collective) you, but
at times you are a slave to it. It is used to defend immoral acts, and at
times its interpretation appears to fly in the face of USA culture and
common sense.

Can you say "pledge ruling"?  I'm not sure that there *can* be an ideal
document-- stuff will always happen that one could never have predicted.

Indeed, but it is important to iron out any imperfections. You constitution
allows political power to be bought and sold. Millionaires can buy
elections. Third parties can run negative campaigns against candidates (eg
NRA). Your embassies are stocked with political donors. I won’t even mention
the plumb book or pork barrelling.


You may feel you are the "freest people in the world", but do black or
Hispanic Americans feel the same? Does their collective lack of economic
power deny them equal access to the political system?

To speak in those terms is IMO racist.

In what respect?

Sure, there will always be those who
are disinfranchised, but it will always cut along the poverty line rather than
the racial one.

You are ignoring reality.

The fate of the poor has always been thus.  At least in this
country, the bar for the poor is higher than in any other country.

Really? How many of your countrymen have no healthcare cover? How many millions?



The fact that we are the greatest economic, military, and cultural
presence on earth is only a testament to that fact, not reasons for it.

Many would argue that the USA has no culture other than consumerism.

Perhaps.  But remember, we've only *been* a culture for 200ish years....

So now you are saying you are not great culturally?

However short that is, we do have quite a rich history already.


I find it interesting that when immigrants come here, they *expect* to be able
to preserve their *former* cultural selves, even their language.  This is quite
a different attitude than, say, 100 years ago.  It tends to divide us rather
than bring us together.  I am not a fan of "diversity" for its own sake--
ironically, find it smacks of racism.

Can forcing your culture on them not also be considered racism?


We have just as many problems as
anyone else.

So life is not all that ?great? after all?

Yes and no.  Our greatest danger comes in times of prosperity. When things get
really tough, that is when Americans band together best.

I think the past few months of “danger” has shown the USA at its worst. The
“banding together” has compromised both your rights and the rights of those
who are not part of your happy club. Understand that much John.

Scott A



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: One nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
 
(...) But then you are simply restricting freedoms. Pretty soon we'd end up like the UK>;-) (...) That you mentioned race-- what would that necessarily have to do with anything? (...) Damn right. People *need* to start *really* being colorblind, and (...) (22 years ago, 4-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  US healthcare (was: One nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.)
 
(...) millions? This common stance ignores the fact that our poor often (at least) obtain medical care when it is needed. When I was a child, our family was poor. I was, however, vacinated at county clinics, had my tonsils removed when I was three, (...) (22 years ago, 4-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: One nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
 
(...) Yes, you are correct. I think we are victims of our own success-- freedom has a price which one must be willing to pay; freedom without responsibility is anarchy and not freedom at all. (...) Can you say "pledge ruling"? I'm not sure that (...) (22 years ago, 4-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

395 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR