 | | Re: One nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. —Dave Schuler
| | | | (...) Hmm. Good point. Still, it's risky for the leader of the nation to take a stance on religion when there's a very real chance of being exclusionary on that basis. (...) Oh, he had a private life--the problem is that everyone knew about it! (...) (22 years ago, 2-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: One nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. —Lindsay Frederick Braun
| | | | | (...) See the following. I rather found it interesting: (URL) Oh, he had a private life--the problem is that everyone knew about it! (...) That's not democracy, if one opinion is higher than all others. It may be reality, but it's anathema to the (...) (22 years ago, 2-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: One nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. —Dave Schuler
| | | | | (...) Uh, just so there's no confusion, I was kidding about the "that's MINE" bit. Dave! (22 years ago, 2-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: One nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. —Lindsay Frederick Braun
| | | | | (...) I know, Dave! I was referring to the idea that the opinion of our razor-thin-plurality President is somehow sacrosanct and allows him to create a religion test for those who sit on the bench. LFB (22 years ago, 2-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | |
