To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 16437
16436  |  16438
Subject: 
Re: Poor Target....
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.market.theory
Date: 
Thu, 23 May 2002 18:43:39 GMT
Viewed: 
1506 times
  
<snip entire debate of fraud on target, Wal-Mart of Jango Fett Slave I>

All these wonderful posts on Matt commiting fraud... =)

After reading all these post for and against his actions it makes me wonder
if those who are mad at him are INDEED mad at him for comitting 'fraud'
(eother in the legal or moral sense).  Could it be that you are REALLY
mad/jesouls (subconsouisly) at  him for

a) getting a $100 set for only $50 while you paid $100
b) getting a $100 set that YOU don't have, yet
c) having the 'talent' of getting the $100 set the way he did or
d) Matt now has ONE MORE TOY that you don't have.

=)

I would find it VERY VERY HARD to believe that all the against people are
INDEED against it for the legal/moral reason they stated ONLY!  We are all
afterwall human and the 'super-ego' that each of us have but dones't know
about is indeed trying this discussion.
-AHui



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Poor Target....
 
(...) Agree 100% :) My guess is they're mad at him for "getting away with it". Something like: "I couldn't bring myself to do that as it's against my moral sense, and I, as a result, think that nobody should be ABLE to get away with it. So I'm mad (...) (23 years ago, 23-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.market.theory)
  Re: Poor Target....
 
I think it has more to do with the fact that he came here and bragged about it then it has to do with it actually being wrong. If you are going to do something shifty, the least you could do is keep it to yourself. Bragging about it is just asking (...) (23 years ago, 23-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.market.theory)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Poor Target....
 
(...) ? Sure they did-- they didn't mean to mark it down by such a percentage, hence they're losing money. IE for each Slave I they sell at $24.99 they loose about $25.00. Not *REALLY* since (more likely) more are being sold than otherwise would, (...) (23 years ago, 23-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.market.theory)

13 Messages in This Thread:




Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR