Subject:
|
Re: Poor Target....
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 24 May 2002 00:10:26 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
382 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler writes:
>
> I'm not actually all that uptight about it, but I'm intrigued by the thought
> experiment...
>
> Dave!
Pesonally, I don't appreciate the braggadocio aspect of the original post.
However, heres a counter example (hypothetical of course)...
Suppose someone takes the Target ad into a WalMart and asks "see this ad, will
you match Target's price ?" Because it is a printed national ad, WM will most
likely match it. The individual buys two of said item, then drives across town
to a different WM. There he says "I want to return these, but I can't find my
receipt". WalMart scans the items and probably gets a price readout of $48.88
each. He takes the store credit, goes back to toys, picks up the aformentioned
$90 set then pays with the store credit (most likely with a little credit
remaining).
Is this any more or less terrible than transporting the merchandse from Target
to WalMart ? What it reveals is a gaping hole between two WM policies (price
matching and giving store credit without a receipt). Yes, someone is taking
advantage of the fault (or courtesy) in the system, but does this represent a
crime ?
Ray
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Poor Target....
|
| (...) Not necessarily true at all, and it would be somewhat narrow and narcissistic of a person to decry only that which he could not bring himself to get away with. The reason I abhor murder has nothing to do with the likelihood that I'd get caught (...) (22 years ago, 23-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.market.theory)
|
13 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
