 | | Re: Poor Target.... —Thomas Garrison
|
| | | (...) Huh? Target didn't lose anything---they were clearly willing to sell the sets as advertised. However, the original post clearly indicates *fraud*, in that: Two Slave Is were purchased at Target, at a cost of $50 (MSRP $100 for both). Those (...) (23 years ago, 22-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Poor Target.... —David Eaton
|
| | | | (...) ? Sure they did-- they didn't mean to mark it down by such a percentage, hence they're losing money. IE for each Slave I they sell at $24.99 they loose about $25.00. Not *REALLY* since (more likely) more are being sold than otherwise would, (...) (23 years ago, 23-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Poor Target.... —Ahui Herrera
|
| | | | <snip entire debate of fraud on target, Wal-Mart of Jango Fett Slave I> All these wonderful posts on Matt commiting fraud... =) After reading all these post for and against his actions it makes me wonder if those who are mad at him are INDEED mad at (...) (23 years ago, 23-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Poor Target.... —David Eaton
|
| | | | | (...) Agree 100% :) My guess is they're mad at him for "getting away with it". Something like: "I couldn't bring myself to do that as it's against my moral sense, and I, as a result, think that nobody should be ABLE to get away with it. So I'm mad (...) (23 years ago, 23-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Poor Target.... —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | | (...) Not necessarily true at all, and it would be somewhat narrow and narcissistic of a person to decry only that which he could not bring himself to get away with. The reason I abhor murder has nothing to do with the likelihood that I'd get caught (...) (23 years ago, 23-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Poor Target.... —David Eaton
|
| | | | | | | (...) Actually, I misspoke, but I'm not sure that's entirely your grievance with my post anyway. Rephrase above to "My guess is they're *also* mad at him..." Not to imply that people aren't mad for other reasons, which I think they are. (...) (...) (23 years ago, 23-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Poor Target.... —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | | | | (...) I agree with you--if I'm writing a novel, I can "conceive" of any number of ways to commit fraud or theft or murder, but in itself that's no wrongdoing. Though I suppose that, if I commit any of those acts, my pre-planning might incriminate (...) (23 years ago, 23-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Poor Target.... —Joseph Williams
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) Congratulations to everyone concerned in regards to their congnitive deducing skills. I had to read half the thread before I had fully figured out what Matt had done and some had already flamed him in the first few posts!! Not much to add here (...) (23 years ago, 23-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Re: Poor Target.... —Matt Sekerak
|
| | | | | | | | | | I love you guys. Well, it's been real...back to work. But first I gotta go return my Gunship at KayBee! Just kidding =) I feel good today, hope everyone else does, too. -Matt . (23 years ago, 25-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Poor Target.... —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | | | | | (...) But it could be illegal just publishing the novel. Just look at the DVD CCA / MPAA case against DeCSS. ROSCO (23 years ago, 23-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Poor Target.... —Ray Sanders
|
| | | | | | (...) Pesonally, I don't appreciate the braggadocio aspect of the original post. However, heres a counter example (hypothetical of course)... Suppose someone takes the Target ad into a WalMart and asks "see this ad, will you match Target's price ?" (...) (23 years ago, 24-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Poor Target.... —Troy Cefaratti
|
| | | | I think it has more to do with the fact that he came here and bragged about it then it has to do with it actually being wrong. If you are going to do something shifty, the least you could do is keep it to yourself. Bragging about it is just asking (...) (23 years ago, 23-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Poor Target.... —Aaron West
|
| | | | (...) I'd like to brag about a scam I pulled of in my college years, could we have a no-flame support group for this sort of thing on LUGNET or is everyone here more morally complete than me? TRU probably hated me, but KB and my LEGO pile loved me (...) (23 years ago, 24-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | |
