 | | Re: If you oppose drug legalization, you support terrorism! —David Eaton
|
| | | (...) I'd say the truth is that legalization isn't associable. It might be more correct to say that if you support illegal drug use, you support terrorism, albeit inderectly. Whether or not its legalization would change the terrorist state isn't (...) (23 years ago, 5-Feb-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: If you oppose drug legalization, you support terrorism! —Maggie Cambron
|
| | | | | (...) You mean like coffee and cocoa? Well they're certainly getting my support, as I start each morning with a pot of 100% Columbian-- and I sometimes have chocolate at breakfast. (...) It seems to me any distinction made between the goods we find (...) (23 years ago, 6-Feb-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: If you oppose drug legalization, you support terrorism! —David Eaton
|
| | | | | | | (...) Not really-- essentially you want a good mix of various products, not all of them physical. In order to graduate from being a 3rd world country, I expect they'd need other profitable areas... not just a single product like cocoa or cigars or (...) (23 years ago, 6-Feb-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: If you oppose drug legalization, you support terrorism! —Maggie Cambron
|
| | | | | | | | (...) But is it in the best interest of the world as a whole for them to graduate from being a third world country? Someone has to produce raw goods. And we don't have the global resources for everyone on the planet to sustain the standard of living (...) (23 years ago, 6-Feb-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: If you oppose drug legalization, you support terrorism! —David Eaton
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Heh-- I brought that up in the other corner of the thread :) Threatening to the US? Potentially. Good(TM)? I dunno. Depends on who for, as usual :) (...) Sad but true. I'm not against them producing raw goods, but it seems that: 1. "3rd world" (...) (23 years ago, 6-Feb-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: If you oppose drug legalization, you support terrorism! —Kirby Warden
|
| | | | | | | | (...) I disagree. Every nation produces raw goods at some level. I'm more worried about large corporations, such as Mansanto in Canada, monopolizing those raw materials/goods just because they've created and patented the means to produce artificial (...) (23 years ago, 6-Feb-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: If you oppose drug legalization, you support terrorism! —David Eaton
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Disagree that the US "doesn't" produce raw goods? Or disagree that there isn't enough for the planet to share the US/Canada/Aus/Euro/etc standard of living? (...) Maggie's point being (I think) that the US doesn't produce enough to sustain (...) (23 years ago, 6-Feb-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: If you oppose drug legalization, you support terrorism! —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | | | | (...) Coca-Cola would return to it's original state. :-) Bruce (23 years ago, 6-Feb-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: If you oppose drug legalization, you support terrorism! —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | | (...) Ah, the good old days! No doubt toothpaste and bubblegum and baby food would soon follow suit. 8^) Dave! (23 years ago, 6-Feb-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: If you oppose drug legalization, you support terrorism! —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | (...) If our federal government does things that encourage terrorism (and I think it does) aren't we also supporting terrorism? I think that one of the things that we do to cause terrorism to flourish is implement policy that rewards violence. One (...) (23 years ago, 6-Feb-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: If you oppose drug legalization, you support terrorism! —David Eaton
|
| | | | | (...) Indirectly, yes. Just like the whole vegetarian debate. I don't directly support animals being treated brutally, but I won't stop eating meat, either. (...) I guess it would depend on your reasoning for supporting the legalization, but I don't (...) (23 years ago, 6-Feb-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: If you oppose drug legalization, you support terrorism! —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | | | (...) I mean, I think we have sufficient wealth that with out too weighty a burden, we could leverage some of that wealth to turn impoverished nations into active customer nations that would eventually blossom into competitors. Not only, _could_ we, (...) (23 years ago, 7-Feb-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: If you oppose drug legalization, you support terrorism! —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | | | (...) Legalization was not mentioned. The commercials were simply meant as a guilt-trip. Bruce (23 years ago, 6-Feb-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: If you oppose drug legalization, you support terrorism! —David Eaton
|
| | | | (...) Now I think I've seen one of the ads in question. It had different teenage-looking kids switching in and out, each one saying a line, then switching: -"I helped kill a father" -"It was just a bit of fun" -"I let a terrorist get a passport" -"I (...) (23 years ago, 8-Feb-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
