 | | Re: left-leaning pantywaists in Britain (Re: So are they prisoners of war or what?) —Scott Arthur
|
| | | (...) It was claimed that they were "happy" - which I thought odd. (...) Concerned, but non-troubling making is how I’d describe it: Straw to quiz US on UK captives (URL) (...) That is irrelevant (even if true). But I do wonder how the next US POW's (...) (23 years ago, 4-Feb-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: left-leaning pantywaists in Britain (Re: So are they prisoners of war or what?) —Frank Filz
|
| | | | (...) The UK detainees are still different from Walker. The current action in Afghanistan is a direct reaction to an attack on US soil. This Walker is alleged to have treasoned against the US, the UK detainees are just non Afghans, just like the (...) (23 years ago, 5-Feb-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: left-leaning pantywaists in Britain (Re: So are they prisoners of war or what?) —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) I thought that Walker was charged with acting against coalition forces in Afghanistan – not involvement in the events of 11.09.01? (...) That was my understanding. (...) Given that his change of sides was so complete, I must admit it did (...) (23 years ago, 5-Feb-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
