 | | Re: Government's role [Was: Re: What happened?] —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | An unlimited democracy with no bounds as to what the majority can decide is indeed flawed. Further, it's unworkable beyond a certain size, and leads to factionalism. A constitutionally limited representative or republican democracy is much better. (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Government's role [Was: Re: What happened?] —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | (...) I think environmental protection and animal "rights" are harder than defense to privatize. In fact, I think defense is relatively easy. Probably easier than roads. (25 years ago, 19-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Government's role [Was: Re: What happened?] —Jasper Janssen
|
| | | | (...) In one sense, yes. In another, hell no. Defense _cannot_ be privatised, _especially_ not in Liberdystopia. The then-privatised DoD would not only no longer be under direct government control, but it would have to compete with others. I for one (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Government's role [Was: Re: What happened?] —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) Microsoft called. They want to know where to submit their proposal for MS-DoD. Steve "I'd go Canada if Bill G. got control" Bliss (25 years ago, 25-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
