Subject:
|
Morals & Ethics reprise (was ...)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 19 Nov 2001 18:31:28 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1418 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks writes:
>
> Now am I expressng morals or ethics (as you defined them) when they aren't
> supported either by a supernatural entity or by social norms and expectations?
The way I define things (similar to Richard, but not quite the same), you
would be expressing morals - that is, a system of conduct in accordance with
right and wrong as you understand them. IMHO, morals are not universal.
Ethics are much like morals, but as Richard notes, they are a societal
standard, not a personal standard.
(hunt hunt hunt) Aha! I knew there was a reason I labled this a reprise:
http://news.lugnet.com/off-topic/debate/?n=2270
(round and round we go, where we stop, nobody knows...)
thanks,
James
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
117 Messages in This Thread: (Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|