|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> > What do you mean acceptable? I have accepted it. And so have you, since you
> > have no choice. But I don't think it's constructive or nice, and I don't
> > think it reflects well on Larry's manners. But so what?
>
> The more people that come to that conclusion the better as far as I am
> concerned.
Ok, here's what I don't get. Better to what end? What happens when everyone
comes to that conclusion? Do you get a prize? Does Larry get to no longer
debate? Does the name calling stop? Why is it so phenomenally important that
each of you proves to the rest of the world that the other one is being
totally inappropriate and idiotic? What comes of such an end? Or are you
trying to convince each other of that fact? And even if so, so what? What then?
In the game that is o-t-debate, pride is a hinderance, not a help.
DaveE
|
|
Message has 2 Replies: | | Re: Larry's behaviour
|
| (...) Maybe because I think what he has done is wrong? Maybe I think that by not sorting the situation that is worse? Maybe I think he should apoligaise? Maybe he will? Who knows? Who cares? Scott A (23 years ago, 23-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Larry's behaviour
|
| (...) The more people that come to that conclusion the better as far as I am concerned. (...) I'm doing it in the rather vain hope that he will sort the mess out. I like to think that if I were in his shoes I would have sorted it either way. Scott (...) (23 years ago, 22-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
118 Messages in This Thread: (Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|