Subject:
|
Re: Larry's behaviour
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 23 Oct 2001 07:40:32 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1029 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Eaton writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> > > What do you mean acceptable? I have accepted it. And so have you, since you
> > > have no choice. But I don't think it's constructive or nice, and I don't
> > > think it reflects well on Larry's manners. But so what?
> >
> > The more people that come to that conclusion the better as far as I am
> > concerned.
>
> Ok, here's what I don't get. Better to what end?
Maybe because I think what he has done is wrong? Maybe I think that by not
sorting the situation that is worse? Maybe I think he should apoligaise?
Maybe he will? Who knows? Who cares?
Scott A
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Larry's behaviour
|
| (...) That's not what I asked. I *KNOW* you think he should apoligaise. I *KNOW* why *YOU'RE* doing it. You're way too proud to bother giving it up. You're addicted to the idea that you'll win. But that's not what I asked. I asked why is it better (...) (23 years ago, 23-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Larry's behaviour
|
| (...) Ok, here's what I don't get. Better to what end? What happens when everyone comes to that conclusion? Do you get a prize? Does Larry get to no longer debate? Does the name calling stop? Why is it so phenomenally important that each of you (...) (23 years ago, 22-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
118 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
