Subject:
|
One day my name will be in lights!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 22 Oct 2001 17:29:13 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
747 times
|
| |
|
|
> I disagree. (I also disagree with Scott's assertion about the LP.)
This is what Larry does not get. I could be wrong by calling the LP a WMC
(by his interpretation of the meaning of WMC). The way to solve that is show
why I am wrong. To say I am a liar, Larry would 1st have to show (by his
interpretation of the meaning of WMC) that I knew that there were
"non-white" members (I honestly do not - although I expect there are). So
Larry could say I was wrong (as you do above) or ill-informed (by his
interpretation of the meaning of WMC).
In conclusion,
If I am wrong - I should be corrected.
If I an not lying - I think I deserve an apology.
If I am lying - I will apologise.
BTW : I am not convinced that either of you understand what I mean by WMC.
To do that, you will have to go back and read Dave's post.
Scott A
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Ok, show me where I have lied? Or apologise.
|
| (...) Oops. I take back what I just wrote. (...) But Larry, you know it won't. (...) I disagree. (I also disagree with Scott's assertion about the LP.) An organization coule be essentially a "white man's club" and still have a token black lady as a (...) (23 years ago, 22-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
118 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
