To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 14035
14034  |  14036
Subject: 
Re: Hiroshima-Was It Necessary?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Followup-To: 
lugnet.off-topic.fun
Date: 
Wed, 17 Oct 2001 15:12:53 GMT
Viewed: 
574 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:

Too many negatives and I got confused, I guess.

  Aren't you saying that it's not the case that you didn't know that what
you hadn't said contradicted what he had said wasn't the case?

     Dave!



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Hiroshima-Was It Necessary?
 
(...) I've never lived in MA so I have no idea if I am saying that or not. Besides I was up late last nite building and sorting so my brain is a bit mushy yet this morning. (note to Dan: I'm not talking to you and that was a humorous (...) (23 years ago, 17-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Hiroshima-Was It Necessary?
 
Typo alert! (...) This should say "we have to accept the outcome that they view themselves as good and us as evil as JUST AS VALID as our own finding of the opposite" Too many negatives and I got confused, I guess. Sorry about that, peeps. (23 years ago, 17-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

133 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR