To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 14033
14032  |  14034
Subject: 
Re: Hiroshima-Was It Necessary?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Wed, 17 Oct 2001 15:04:46 GMT
Viewed: 
562 times
  
Typo alert!

In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
we have to accept the outcome that they view themselves
as evil and themselves as bad as JUST AS VALID as our own finding.

This should say "we have to accept the outcome that they view themselves as
good and us as evil as JUST AS VALID as our own finding of the opposite"

Too many negatives and I got confused, I guess.

Sorry about that, peeps.



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Hiroshima-Was It Necessary?
 
(...) Aren't you saying that it's not the case that you didn't know that what you hadn't said contradicted what he had said wasn't the case? Dave! (23 years ago, 17-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Hiroshima-Was It Necessary?
 
(...) Well that's the crux of the hole in my argument. Unless it can be shown that it is NOT a subjective judgement (that is, that it's not just a morally relative judgement), we have to accept the outcome that they view themselves as evil and (...) (23 years ago, 17-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

133 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR