To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 13994
13993  |  13995
Subject: 
Re: Hiroshima-Was It Necessary?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Tue, 16 Oct 2001 16:47:36 GMT
Viewed: 
565 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Eaton writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
I think the evidence is against them being necessary to beat Japan (they
were already beaten). Cynics will say that they provided a test for the new
toy (I can't believe that).

From what I heard from a US history teacher, the question was being
considered as to whether or not to test on an uninhabited island. We were
considering "demonstrating" on the island to other nations, but were worried
that "What if the tests failed? We'd look stupid!". Hence, if tests were all
that were needed, there would be plenty of other targets to hit.

Why was there no demo explosion in an uninhabited island to convince the
Japanese of the power of the bomb? What would be lost? If it failed - nobody
would know. If the real thing failed, the Japanese would have a bomb (or at
least bits of one).


But I do wonder if they were deemed necessary
simply to send the right message to Jo Stalin. It may even be the case that
they were worth it in that respect?

To what end? How differently would Stalin have acted had we not done so, in
your opinion? I admit I'm not the most informed on the matter, obviously...

Me neither. I hope the bombs were not dropped just for the hell of it!

Scott A


DaveE



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Hiroshima-Was It Necessary?
 
(...) No, the idea was that they'd invite other nations to send representatives to witness the event-- not that we couldn't have merely recorded the event anyway. At least such was my understanding. I don't remember if it was explicitly said, or (...) (23 years ago, 16-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Hiroshima-Was It Necessary?
 
(...) From what I heard from a US history teacher, the question was being considered as to whether or not to test on an uninhabited island. We were considering "demonstrating" on the island to other nations, but were worried that "What if the tests (...) (23 years ago, 16-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

133 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR