| | Re: Cuba is a terrorist state (was Re: Any truth in this one - Cuba as a terrostist state. Larry Pieniazek
|
| | <Snip> Here is the US government reasoning for who is on the list and who is off. Note that this material well predates 911. (URL) is a section of (URL) found the list of FTOs interesting. (URL) how intertwined they all seem to be. The site alleges (...) (23 years ago, 14-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | |
| | | | Re: Cuba is a terrorist state (was Re: Any truth in this one - Cuba as a terrostist state. Lawrence Wilkes
|
| | | | "Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message news:GL6rMI.4nw@lugnet.com... (...) Or perhaps you could also ask the question how many sympathisers to thier cause do you need in the US government? Or how many votes might be lost if (...) (23 years ago, 14-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Cuba is a terrorist state (was Re: Any truth in this one - Cuba as a terrostist state. Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | (...) Those were posed as rhetorical questions I assume, but they are nevertheless valid and I admit of no answer. (23 years ago, 14-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Cuba is a terrorist state (was Re: Any truth in this one - Cuba as a terrostist state. Lindsay Frederick Braun
|
| | | | | (...) The corollary of Lawrence's question, of course, is: "how many votes might be lost if they *aren't* on the list?" I noticed the very small amount of text re: Cuba, and none that implies a state sponsorship--it appears to be more a matter of (...) (23 years ago, 14-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | Re: Cuba is a terrorist state (was Re: Any truth in this one - Cuba as a terrostist state. Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) Yep. You last comment is old news in the UK. A few years ago we literally caught a boat load or arms (inc SAMs) from Libya. I think since then, Libya told the UK just what it had supplied to help counter the IRA. See: (URL) the help the IRA (...) (23 years ago, 14-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |