To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 13780
13779  |  13781
Subject: 
Re: PA censoring journalists again, but repudiating bin Laden...
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 11 Oct 2001 08:07:57 GMT
Viewed: 
358 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:


Is this "censoring" really any worse than this:

US urges curb on Arab TV channel
http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/americas/newsid_1578000/1578619.stm
==+==
Washington has asked Qatar to reign in the influential and editorially
independent Arabic al-Jazeera television station, which gives airtime to
anti-American opinions.
==+==

Here's a bit more.

http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/000/349xmyff.asp

They draw the conclusion that Powell may be overreacting a bit, and I tend
to agree.

I loved this line:
==+==
National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice criticized Al Jazeera for the
broadcast, on the grounds that, among other things, it could be used to send
coded messages to terrorist "sleepers" in the United States and elsewhere.
==+==

Was it show on CNN? I bet it was! If they had got it 1st, would they have
shown it? I bet they would! Would there be calls to censor CNN? I doubt it!

Scott A



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: PA censoring journalists again, but repudiating bin Laden...
 
(...) Yes, in fact it was (...) No bet. They would have, based on the environment they operate in. (...) Actually there have been, as it turns out. All the major US networks have been requested not to show these taped missives any more and all (...) (23 years ago, 11-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: PA censoring journalists again, but repudiating bin Laden...
 
(...) Here's a bit more. (URL) draw the conclusion that Powell may be overreacting a bit, and I tend to agree. (23 years ago, 11-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

117 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR